Spencer Clark Cards and Life

Kevin Ho Interview – May 2012

Posted on May 24, 2012

Kevin Ho

 

Spence: How's it going?

Kevin: Pretty good!

 

How did your Magic-Con lecture go? Were you nervous to present?

Oh boy, I was hella nervous. I actually didn't get much sleep the night before since I was so worried about giving a good presentation. I'd done a lecture in London before, but this was the first time I was doing a talk in front of so many people, let alone some of the world's best magicians, so you can probably understand why I was pacing back and forth in the hotel room at 7am, making sure all my slides were free of typos and that I'd memorized all my key points so I didn't have to keep referring back to my notes like a n00b. The worst part was that the coffee machine in the room wasn't even working properly, so I was just running on nervous energy the whole night long... no caffeine, just pure, 100% adrenaline. True story.

Cut to a few hours later and I'm backstage, watching David Acer, Jared Kopf, Lance Pierce and Paul Wilson rock the house, while I'm sitting on my hands and taking deep breaths so I can calm myself down before it's my turn to go up. With just about ten minutes left before showtime, I finally muster up the courage to approach Paul Wilson and ask him if he has any tips for calming down one's nerves. What he said to me next was probably the best advice I've ever been given on performance anxiety, and I still keep these words in mind every time I get nervous before a show:

"Just be nervous. It's okay to be nervous. If you're not nervous, it means you don't care."

Suffice it to say, Paul's words of wisdom were just what I needed, and from that point on I focused on delivering my content as well as I could without worrying about any psychosomatic jitters that were out of my control anyway. And to quote a popular anti-meme, Everything Went Better Than Expected. I opened with one of my most difficult flourishes (Satellite) and didn't drop any cards, people laughed at my Y U NO and rage comic slides, the other flourishes I demoed garnered an audibly positive response, and one of the best moments of the talk was when I screened the Virtuoso Gambit video and had a room full of magicians applauding afterwards.

True story: after I got off stage, I was greeted by Jared Kopf behind the curtain, who shook my hand and said, "Dude! That Gambit video was THE TITS!!"

#somuchwin

 

For those of us who couldn't be there, what did you talk about during your lecture?

My lecture was about a recent breakthrough I had regarding creativity in card flourishing, which was that we need to focus less on techniques and more on ideas. In my view, insiders appreciate the techniques involved, whereas those unfamiliar with the art are more appreciative of the ideas on display. With more than enough techniques already in existence, I feel that it's about time we started applying them in new directions, instead of just coming up with slightly different ways to do the same thing. This way, our performances will have a more memorable and longer-lasting impact on our real-life audiences, which in turn will lead to a much wider interest in and understanding of this budding art form. Think about it this way: you and I might be able to tell one Sybil variation from another and objectively know which one is technically more difficult, but when it comes to an audience of non-flourishers, I bet that the only ones they would really remember, let alone be able to identify, would be Madison's Sybil in the Rain and De'vo's Cradle to Grave routine, and that's because each has a strong idea and iconic image to them that makes them stand out in the minds of those who are seeing this for the first time.

So where to get all these fabled 'new ideas', then? That leads us to the main thrust of my talk: for those of us who aren't Andrei, Dimitri, or Jonas (in the sense of seemingly being able to just sit by themselves and deliberately conjure up new inventions out of thin air), one of the best ways to come up with ideas for new flourishes is to take two familiar, pre-existing concepts and combine them in a new and/or unexpected way. In fact, many of the most iconic and creative flourishes out there can be traced back to this combinatorial process. For example:

Vertigo = Card flourish + hacky sack
Cobra Cut = One-handed cut + semblance and motion of a cobra
Anaconda = Dribble + "how far can we take this?"
Open Faro = Faro shuffle + expanded deck principle
The WERM = Z-grip + Josh Sadowsky's Wu-Tang + 5-card display
Card isolations = Card flourishes + contact juggling techniques
Armspread = Ribbon spread and turnover + "what if we did it without the table?"

And so on and on. In other words, Everything is a Remix.

In my talk I also stressed the importance of venturing outside of one's comfort zones. If you only look to magic and flourishing for inspiration, then you're limiting yourself in terms of the ideas and techniques that you can borrow from other art forms and resources. I gave a few examples of concepts I'd come up with by looking outside of flourishing in my keynote, which included references to shadow sculpture, OK GO, Reggie Watts-style live looping and layering, Inception, and, of all things, Old Spice.

Lastly, I touched on the idea that there were usually two types of creative people when it comes to the development of new flourishes: Visionaries, and Engineers. Visionaries are the people who have a gift for coming up with new ideas, and have a very clear vision of what the ideal manifestation of it will look like, even if they have no clue how to achieve it. Engineers, on the other hand, may not be so good with coming up with new ideas, but are the types of people who are willing to put in the time and effort to tinker around with a deck of cards, trying to come up with solutions and techniques for achieving and/or improving the ideas put forth by the Visionaries. Each creative type depends on the other for the advancement of the art, which is why it's so important that we have outlets like the internet and real-life gatherings where we can share these concepts and techniques, so that we can either turn to our fellow artists' technical ingenuity to turn our pipe dreams into realities, or to get inspiration for new concepts to develop and work on, for those of us who are more technically inclined. Obviously, some people are good at both, and those people are usually the ones who make the largest contributions to the community.

If you're interested in hearing more about the talk, Theory11 interviewed me a day after my lecture, so here's a video of me talking with Christen Gerhart about some of the things I spoke about on stage:

Kevin Ho on Remixing Culture - theory 11

Why and how did you pick up Origami?

Like everyone else, I used to enjoy making paper airplanes and cootie catchers as a kid, but I only began to get into origami as a serious hobby near the end of last year, after I'd seen the documentary 'Between the Folds' by Vanessa Gould.

I'd seen Robert J. Lang give a talk at Magic-Con earlier that year and developed a better understanding of the art form as a result, but one moment in particular in the documentary provided the 'tipping point' for me wanting to delve into it myself. Chris K. Palmer demonstrated his and Jeremy Shafer's Hexagonal Spinning Flasher, which is a model that's folded in such a way that if you grab two of its corners and pull, by letting go the model will automatically collapse on itself, the resulting momentum causing the model to rapidly spin on the table LIKE A FREAKIN' TOP. Words fail to describe how awesome this is, so here's a video of it in action.

I guess what attracted me to origami was the same thing that first fascinated me with flourishing all those years ago. That at its core, it was about taking a familiar, mundane object — be it a sheet of square-shaped paper or a pack of ordinary playing cards — and eliciting from it all these beautiful patterns, movements and shapes, most of which were completely unexpected and surprising in a wondrous way. To my mind, the way Bob Neale's Fluttering Butterfly works is equally as amazing as the mechanics behind a LePaul spread — that somehow, the way everything seems to just 'fit' together and work so well speaks to this grander, overarching, invisible elegance that's secretly behind it all. Or some shit like that.

As for how I began to pick it up — as with anyone venturing into any technically advanced art form, I started off with a couple videos here and there on YouTube. The best I've come across is JoNakashima's channel, where I was first introduced to many awesome modular models like the Slinky and Yami Yamauchi's Fireworks. I was always more attracted to pattern, tessellation, or action-based models than static animal sculptures, so these were a great starting point for me.

Later on I decided to commit by purchasing an origami book so I had a lot of models to practice with, and one of the titles that happened to be available at the local bookstore at the time was Jeremy Shafer's 'Origami to Astonish and Amuse', which contained such original oddities as a fully functional Swiss Army Knife, a working pair of nail clippers, and a piano that played itself — each folded from a single sheet of square-shaped paper, with no cutting or pasting involved. Needless to say, a lot of these models are incredibly difficult, but a few easier models such as the Interlocking Rings and the Bird of Peace Pop-up Card have made it into my regular origami repertoire. He has a YouTube channel as well, which you can (and should) check out here.

Lately I've been venturing into tessellation-based origami, which is the kind that artists like Chris K. Palmer and Eric Gjerde are known for. When I attended the Bay Area Rapid Folders in San Francisco meeting last month, I learned Palmer's Flower Tower from an incredibly talented 9-year-old origamist, which was both inspiring and humbling at the same time.

Sadly, to this day I still haven't been able to fold the Hexagonal Spinning Flasher yet, but as soon as I find the time to get the right type of paper, a printer, a jar of water, a marble, and a rubber band, I'm going to take a few hours off to finally git 'er done.

 

What is your favorite card video of all time, and why?

Hands down, the original 2003 Spring Jam by Dan and Dave Buck. No other flourishing performance before that or since then has so wholly and completely transported me to another world like that video did, and the number of times I've watched and re-watched it has definitely reached at least the mid-three-digit range by now.

There's something about the twins' disembodied hands just floating in this white space and doing all these crazy, jacked-up, multi-packeted maneuvers that causes one to imagine this alternate reality where that's all that ever happens. Just this abstract patch of space-time where fingers and blue and red rectangles collide to create these rhythmic contortions that shouldn't be possible yet somehow are. Needless to say, I forced myself to up my game after that, in the hope that someday I would reach that same level of awesomeness. Remember the beginning of 2001: A Space Odyssey? I was an ape. This was the monolith.

(Fun fact: when I first saw Spring Jam I immediately called up my friend Huron and told him to check it out. After he'd watched it he didn't seem too impressed, until I told him that it was a video by Dan and Dave Buck. To which he, I swear to god, replied, "Wait - you mean that wasn't CGI?!?!")

 

Favorite food?

It kind of changes depending on what my mood is. Right now I'm in the mood for some Xiao Long Baos, but other times I'll have a craving for 4 Fingers Crispy Chicken, roasted duck rice, or Char Kway Teow. There are a few staples, though: phở, sushi, shabu shabu, durian, dim sum, mongolian beef grill, the barbecue pizza at Sharky's, Peking duck, really good steak, and Pepper Lunch. Oh, and anything my mom cooks. Of course.

 

How has the Singapore card scene influenced your flourishing?

Simply put, if it wasn't for Singapore, I wouldn't even be doing this today. Meeting Bone showed me that flourishing can look waaaaay cooler in person than it does on video, Huron and Daren are my most trusted creative collaborators and a constant source of inspiration, and the fact that the country's so small that you're literally no more than an hour away from anybody on the island makes it really easy to meet up with fellow flourishers and session whenever people happen to be free.

Despite the fact that I may have some gripes with the local arts scene (or lack of it) in general, Singapore is definitely an awesome place to be for card flourishing, and I consider myself lucky to have been in the right place at the right time back in '03.

 

What is your favorite flourish?

My favorite flourish of all time is Molecule 2 by Los Hermanos Buck. Cut, toss, swivel, tap, flip, done. Incredibly elegant and self-contained, even though it includes an aerial move at the end. I remember first learning this on Hit the Road and dropping cards everywhere trying to do the TG Murphy Deck Flip. Now I have a near-perfect success rate with the flip, and am working on a version where the packet momentarily stalls on the back of the hand before completing the cut. It's tricky, but I'll nail it eventually.

As for my favorite move that I've created (not that you asked, but what the hell), right now I'd have to say that I'm really proud of 'Satellite'. It's kind of ridiculous and is still pretty knacky to pull off, but once I'm able to perform it successfully I know I'm all warmed up. Once again, thanks to my buddy Jaspas for coming up with a key move that allowed me to complete this damn move after two years. Coming up with flourishes is hard, man.

 

A genie gives you three wishes, what do you wish for?

1. For the economy to no longer be based on money, but on karma. Good deeds = more financial sway. Yes, it has its flaws, but who knows? It's a lot harder for people to be corrupt if they HAVE to do nice things for others to get ahead in life.

2. The ability to read minds, but also the ability to switch this ability off at will. It'd be interesting to know what people's thoughts are at certain times (especially those of people whose language I don't speak), but sometimes I'd just rather not know.

3. Better teachers. Boring teachers make for boring classes, which lead to bored students who end up attaching negative connotations to education. Things like Howcast, Mythbusters, and Wikipedia have shown that it's possible to learn without it necessarily being soul-draining, and if every teacher in the world had the same passion and enthusiasm as the average TED presenter, school would be something to look forward to, instead of an impersonal institution where one is judged on his or her ability to regurgitate (mostly) irrelevant information.

 

What is your favorite year in cards, and why?

2004.

That was the year when CheatersCheater.com was at its height, and every day you would have new videos on the front page that contained all these never-before-seen ideas and concepts that inspired me to no end. That was also around the time I discovered people like Daniel Madison, ALI, Jonas, KC Ushijima, and the Bucks, who all raised the bar in terms of what I considered possible in flourishing.

Oh, and that's the year that Virtuoso was founded, too.

 

Is there a possibility of introducing a new member to The Virts? (Re-Reintroduction?)

The answer to this question is 'not anytime soon'. It seems that people are under the impression that we're always changing our line-up since we've had members leave and join here and there over the years, but as it is right now, Huron, Daren, and I are happy with our current arrangement and are not actively recruiting anyone new at the moment.

That being said, if someone happens to come along in the future and impresses us to the point where we'd be stupid not to want to collaborate with him or her to drive the art forward, then adding that person as a new member would definitely be a possibility. At that point, though, it would probably be obvious from that person's work whether or not his or her talents and vision as an artist would be something we'd consider a boon to the team, so the bottom line is that if you're good enough, you won't have to ask if you can become a member. We'll be the ones asking you.

In regards to remixing culture, what concepts have you incorporated into your flourishing?

At the moment, I've been studying the word of Eric Gjerde and other tessellation-based origamists and trying to find ways of incorporating the way these patterns are constructed into my flourishes. Artistically speaking, symmetry is something that I have a strong passion for, and one day I'd love to be able to actually come up with a display that looks like this without having to, well, cheat.

In addition to that, I'm looking to explore a concept I came up with that was inspired by the rotating hallway scene in Inception. I won't say much, except that it involves a Gyroscope, and that it'll look incredible if it actually ever comes into fruition. That's the thing about the creative process — thinking up the idea in your head is relatively easy, it's just turning it into a reality that's the hard part.

 

What are some of your favorite movies?

This could end up becoming a whole other interview in and of itself, so for right now I'm just going to limit it to the top ten, off the top of my head, and I'll be keeping the descriptions short at that:

1. Fight Club. Really spoke to my 17-year-old, adolescent male brain at the time, and that twist left my jaw hanging even after the credits were rolling. Fincher = god.

2. The Matrix. Life-changing. This is one of those movies that I could just leave on repeat forever, and just lip-sync to the entire time.

3. Oldboy. Brutal, bloody, and brilliant. That hallway scene. You can feel the fury through the screen the entire time.

4. Confessions. Only came out a couple of years ago, but already a masterpiece in my mind. Definitely not as colorful as the director's earlier works, and that's a good thing. Talk about one hell of an opening scene, too.

5. There Will Be Blood. No one does dread like PT Anderson. Daniel Day-Lewis owns. And Jonny Greenwood did the score. Need I say more?

6. The Prestige. By far the best movie about magic and magicians. I always get something new out of this every time I see it, and Nolan does an amazing job of constantly changing the way you feel about each of the main characters as the plot continues to develop.

7. City of God. In my opinion, the greatest film ever made. Everything about this. This. If you haven't seen it yet, do. It's beyond amazing.

8. Inception. Seeing this at the Arclight Dome for the first time was like being in a psychological roller-coaster, except the roller-coaster was the entire theater. There's a reason it took ten years to make — it's perfect, in every sense of the word.

9. Superbad. Shut up. This was awesome. I laughed my ass off when I saw this in theaters, and I still laugh my ass off every time I play it on DVD.

10. Technically not a feature film, but anything and everything by Don Hertzfeldt. His animations were a huge inspiration to me growing up, and it's still one of my life goals to create something that has the same emotional impact that Everything Will Be OK and I Am So Proud of You had on me when I first saw them. You're probably familiar with his cult classic 'Rejected', but do check out all his other stuff if you haven't already. Highly recommended.

 

What are your goals for cards and life in the next 5-10 years?

Card-wise, I hope to play a part in spreading the art of card flourishing to a much larger international audience than it has now, especially those in non-English speaking countries. Hopefully, this will lead to more people exploring the technical and conceptual areas of the art, which is always a good thing. And the day card flourishing makes it big, and I mean BIG, in Japan — oh man. NOTHING is going to be the same after that.

Life-wise, I want to be able to articulate my ideas better, and to further develop my character and perspective as an artist: as a flourisher, as a magician, and as a storyteller. Seeing Rob Zabrecky perform and lecture at Magic-Con last month was a huge inspiration to me in terms of watching someone fuse everything he loved and was passionate about into a single, unique act, to the point where the only way to describe what he did was to mention his name. I'm an insatiable consumer of film, literature, and music, so it would be nice to finally have an outlet to apply all of this material I've let saturate in my head over the years. I mean, it has to go somewhere, right?

 

Any advice for cardists?

Three things:

1. Determine who your audience is. Is it going to be fellow flourishers watching your videos on the internet, or is it going to be people out in the real world, who've never seen this before and will therefore not be able to differentiate or appreciate 90% of what you do unless you selectively hone and curate your material? You don't have to stick to one or the other – you just have to be aware who you're performing for, and that the responses and reactions will vary accordingly. For example, original material will probably garner you a better response online, but when it comes to performing for non-flourishers in real life, your execution and presentation of your material, original or not, is what will generate a positive or negative response in your spectators.

2. Remember the 'tipping point', that moment when you saw a move, routine, or video so inspiring that it caused you to want to pick up this art form yourself? Make that the aim of every flourish performance you give. One of the advantages of flourishing is that, most times, you get to practice and perform at the same time, but that doesn't mean that your performances should always settle for the level of practice. Try to re-create that feeling of amazement in your audience with every performance you give. Who knows, you might just accidentally create your next arch-nemesis (Dimitri, I'm looking at you).

3. Slow down. Remember that for many of the people in your audience, this is probably the first, last, and only time they'll be seeing someone do flourishes in real life. Don't rob them of the experience by rushing through it and doing your material so quickly that everything melds together into an indistinguishable blur. While what you're doing may not seem fast to you, the people watching aren't used to the motion and movements of your flourishes, so it's upon you to present your material at a digestible pace that they can easily comprehend. Remember when you were learning a foreign language in high school, and the native speakers always seemed to speak too quickly for you to understand? It's like that. Your fellow flourishers on the internet are 'fluent'. Your lay audiences are not. This doesn't mean you have to perform at a sluggish pace, but that you should do as best as you can to 'enunciate' your flourishes in a way so that those unfamiliar with the 'language' of flourishes can fully appreciate the beauty of its linguistics. Or some shit like that.

 

Closing thoughts?

Big thanks to Spence for letting me do this interview, and to you guys for reading the whole thing. I'd love to hear your thoughts on my answers, so do leave a comment below, or send me an email at visualmadness[at]gmail[dot]com

Peace!

 

To see more, check out Kevin's channel (Click Here), and blog (Click Here)

 

What did you think of the interview?

Leave a comment below!

Comments (10) Trackbacks (1)
  1. Kevin….You are BRILLIANT! Very right statments, especially in your 3 wishes. And thanks to you and spencer for making this interview.

  2. Amazing Interview. VERY good read

  3. I like that the length of these interviews are getting more in depth, as in each answer provided by the interviewee provides clear and visual explanations–or maybe that is just kevin’s style..

    What I had some tension with was with your first wish to the genie. I have a similar belief; however thinking more deeply into this concept, it can clearly be seen that many people would become fake. I know you mentioned that there are flaws, but I think these flaws are too extreme to even consider this as a possible means of control for the economy.

    I liked all your advice and wish that I was there to hear and see your presentation at Magic-Con. Too bad University life is too time consuming and too bad I’m in New York instead of Cali. Well, I’m excited to see what is to come in the future and hope that you will keep us updated.

  4. You’re a wise man, Kevin.

    Question time…
    How exactly were you thinking cardistry should be spread out to the masses? (If this is a Virtuoso secret – ignore this question.) How can we avoid that typical “it looks good, but what is the point in doing that?” comment when introducing this artform to laypeople? And how can we encourage these completely cardistry-ignorant people to try out this crazy hard shizzle we do wit ‘em cardzz, instead of just entertain them?

    Also, have you ever done a only-cardistry (no magic) performance for someone? What kind of reaction did you get?

    -Oliver

  5. super awesome interview ! thanks for the shout out :D
    those origami actually looked very cool… i might try those ! i have a question though, you talk about difficulty in origami, i don’t really get it, is there some skills involved? isn’t it just folding as you’re told?

    dimitri.

  6. I agree with dimitri, the origami looks really cool. can’t remember the last time i’ve seen it that way. but then yea, how is there skill involved? if you would compare it to a card flourish, it takes time and patience to perfect a flourish. how does this go with origami?

    I can imagine that doing an origami piece for the first time, it wouldn’t look as good as the person teaching you. but then again at this point i wouldn’t think it would take you days or weeks to perfect that same piece.

    I enjoyed the interview and i’m glad we got to know a little more about you kevin!
    Thanks for sharing Paul’s advice as well.
    And thank you spencer for taking the interview.

    Bas

  7. @Shadi & Waqas: Thanks! Glad you enjoyed the interview :)

    @Stanley: Regarding the first wish from the genie, I agree with you that implementing it would lead to people being nice under false pretenses. Perhaps the requirement should be that people could earn these ‘karma credits’ only if the goodwill was heartfelt and genuine? I guess that would mean that those without a moral compass would have to change their ways or die out, which is in itself a kind of natural selection, in a way: survival of the kindest. Haha. Either way, I think it’d be an interesting alternative instead of the standardized-stuff-tickets system we have in place today. Not better, necessarily — just more interesting.

    As for being too busy with school — I sure know how that feels. Glad I’m done with it so I have time to work on my own stuff. And yeah, sucks that you missed this year’s Magic-Con (there’s always 2014!), but with people like Tony Chang, Ricky Smith, and even David Blaine all based in New York, I’m sure you guys could definitely host your own local mini-Magic-Con in the meantime :D

    @Oliver: I’ll answer your questions one at a time:

    1. This’ll seem kind of obvious, but I think that the internet and social media are some of the best and fastest ways to spread awareness of card flourishing around the world. With just the click of the button, you enable people who are hundreds of thousands of miles away from you to suddenly become aware of this art form’s existence, all without having to get your passport stamped or even leaving the house. However, this begs the question: since we’re all already doing this, why isn’t flourishing more popular? Well, it’s one thing to put a video out there, but it’s another thing for it to warrant the attention of a complete stranger for 20 seconds or more. If you consider the type of videos you get linked to from Facebook, Twitter, reddit, digg, 9gag, or wherever you get your procrastination material from, consider what got you to click on the link to the video in the first place. Odds are, the title, screenshot, and/or video description had some kind of hook that guaranteed an emotional experience, whether it was explicitly stated or implied: “Your jaw will drop when you see what this 2-year-old did to this gas station”, “Man jumps 400 kegs of beer on a Razor scooter… and he has no limbs!”, “This must be what the inside of David Bowie’s head looks like”, etc. Non-flourishers can’t relate to things like ‘hey guys, jus a lil’ sumthin i was workin on to give back to the community’, but if we learn to market our work in such a way that it informs the viewer of the awesome time they’re about to have watching the video and educates them as to what exactly we’re doing, then my guess is that we’ll be seeing an increase in the number of card flourishing videos that get shared with the general public in the long run.

    2. I’ve given this a lot of thought, and I think that one possible approach is to present flourishing in the form of routines rather than separate, individual ‘tricks’. What led me to this insight was watching a friend of mine who does contact juggling give an impromptu performance once, and the way he improvised to my music and structured his routine so that it had a progressive build in terms of impressiveness, all without him needing to say a word explaining anything, really testified to the fact that art could speak for itself, as long as it seemed like the artist really knew what he was doing. There’s a certain sense of intense focus that my favorite flourishers have when they’re performing — it’s not just their hands, but their eyes and the body language of their entire figure that tell you exactly where you should be looking. That being said, it’s also important not to take oneself *too* seriously — doing so only invites ridicule and challenges, and that’s not what we want. A perfect example is Dimitri’s Silent Transition, where there’re a couple of great shots of him just smirking in a playful way, showing the viewer that a) he’s just a dude, like you and me, and b) this is fun to him, and the enthusiasm and energy is contagious.

    3. I think that the key to this is in my second answer in the ‘advice for cardists’ section of the interview. We can link to tons of free material online, pass half our deck of cards to people in real life and go ‘here, try this!’, but when it comes right down to it, I believe that inspiration is the real seed that needs to be planted before one can grow into a full-fledged flourisher. Having the resources is one thing, but having the desire to want to achieve the results in the first place is what will lead to one pursuing those exact resources eventually. So I guess what I’m saying is: just do the best job you can, and people will want to pick it up if our performances reach that ‘tipping point’.

    4. I’m do more magic when it comes to performing full-fledged stuff for people, but I have done flourish-only demonstrations in the past. Generally I try and make sure that the stuff is as varied as possible and that there’s a progressive build to the material, so responses to them are generally quite good. I also tend to throw in a lot of humor and light-heartedness into my performances, as the people at Magic-Con this year can attest to. Just mention the table-less Rosetta shuffle, the Face Cut, Force Field, or even Jules’ Batman display, and those who’ve seen it will definitely attest to my general nuttiness when it comes to these sorts of things.

    @Dimitri: My pleasure. Love your work, looking forward to your DVD with Theory28.

    @Dimitri & @Bas: Great question regarding origami, especially since this goes back to the whole techniques vs. ideas thing again: at the beginning of my Magic-Con talk I recounted an anecdote involving showing my friend Eric Gjerde’s Waterbomb Tessellation, to which he reacted with a detached, ‘uh… what is it supposed to be?’ It’s kind of hard to appreciate the beauty of a lot of origami techniques upon seeing the final product, since the entire construction process takes place behind the scenes, so I’ll do my best to describe why some origami models can end up being a lot more difficult than simply following directions.

    Basically, there is usually a direct correlation between how many steps an origami model takes to fold and how difficult it is. One would think that just following directions wouldn’t be such a big deal, but the more folds get added to a single piece of paper, the more complicated things get: depending on the type of paper you’re using, one of two things will happen: with thinner paper, all the folding will start to put stress on the paper, leading to potential tearing and then heartbreak with further advancement of the piece. With thicker paper, it’s harder to create repeat folds upon a previously-folded double (or more) layer because the paper tends to bunch up together after a while. The other thing that tends to happen is that when you get to a latter steps of a particularly long piece, the folds that you need to make get smaller in smaller, with some only being able to be done using tweezers, or very nimble fingers. Folds can sometimes get into weird, hard-to-access places that are inside of a model, which makes folding them a real pain in the A. The thing that I feel takes the most skill, though, from my personal experience, is that in order to make your models come out as nice-looking as possible in the end, precision is of utmost important throughout the entire folding process. Lining up an edge up to a crease and being off by just a few millimeters can have major repercussions down the line, and with all the other folds that get smaller and smaller, involving more and more layers getting folded on top of each other, it takes great skill and patience to be able to physically manage where everything is going, let alone keep the paper from collapsing in on itself in some cases.

    That being said, it’s one way to describe the difficulties in origami in textual form, but another to experience it first-hand for oneself. So what I propose is this: grab a square-shaped piece of paper and give the following tutorial below a shot, and you’ll find that the further along Brian Chan gets with the model, the harder it’ll be to achieve the same results he’s getting.

    The flip side, of course, is that you find the process incredibly easy and also get a Guy Fawkes mask out of the process, which you have to admit is pretty flippin’ cool.

    How to fold a V for Vendetta Mask (Video Tutorial Pt 1 + 2):
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JwyIDogYaqI
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KK_gQW5r73s

    Diagrams:
    http://www.instructables.com/id/Guy-Fawkes-Mask-in-Origami/?ALLSTEPS

  8. @Kevin

    Another way to spread flourishing, is to create hype.
    This can be the next COOL thing! All we have to do is spread it. :S

    Yeah that’s one heck of a problem.

    How about walking around markets, hang out places, etc, and doing cardistry?
    However, I would STRONGLY recommend doing only XCMish moves for laymen, as they are excellent displays of skill and finesse. Going out there and doing 50 different two handed cuts will not impress them as much as one armspread catch and a spring. Food for thought.

    AND, laymen don’t give a rat’s ass about originality. If I were to try and spread the art, by whatever means, whether it be walking around doing it or releasing videos, I would do the BEST moves of the art, not MY best moves. Why? Because frankly speaking, I would like to anyone including myself come up with a new move as impressive and good as the spring or the arsmpread or a big ass aerial.

    May your flourishes flourish.

    Peace!

  9. Nice interview Spencer. Nice answers too Kevin.

    I’d love to hear more about that: “In my talk I also stressed the importance of venturing outside of one’s comfort zones” I share a lot this idea, not only for creating flourishes, magic concepts, etc but also on living my life.

    “Lastly, I touched on the idea that there were usually two types of creative people when it comes to the development of new flourishes: Visionaries, and Engineers.” These words remind me of Ascanio. When he talks about the types of Magicians, he also mention something very similar to this. I share this point too. Personally I prefer watching perform people who break the rules (visionaries), who offers something new an amazing I’ve never seen before. This is for me one of the strongest points in the definition of “Artist”.

    -Miquel

  10. @Waqas Good point regarding originality for laypeople — to most of them, everything you’re doing is new, so it’s really a matter of doing it well and getting them to appreciate it. It kind of reminds me of the old saying, “It’s not about having what you want; it’s about wanting what you have.” In relation to flourishing, I think we forget sometimes how awesome the stuff we’re doing already is — a spring is incredible, a well-done ribbon spread and turnover is incredible, and a deliciously even thumb fan where you can see every single one of the 52 pips is also incredible. It’s just a manner of making the audience aware of this fact, and sometimes reminding ourselves of it too.

    On the flipside, though, while I see what you’re saying with the XCM comment, I don’t think it’s an absolute matter of only these types of moves being able to make an impact on people. Look at Daren. Look at Michael James. Look at Jonas. These are guys who could do exactly that — 50 different two-handed cuts one after the other — but it’s because of their incredible execution, finesse, intensity of focus, flow, rhythm, and ability to essentially hypnotize their audiences with their work that gives their performances such weight in terms of creating a memorable moment for their spectators.

    Conversely, I’ve seen people do armspreads, springs, fans, and other XCM-ish moves for a live audience, but done in such a poorly-executed, trivial, and haphazard way that there’s no time to appreciate them, let alone understand what there is to appreciate about it. In the end, execution and showmanship really are king, regardless of the genre.

    @Miquel: The idea of looking outside one’s comfort zones (i.e. magic and flourishing, for most people) is something that I really came to appreciate from reading Steal Like an Artist, Creative Thinkering, A Technique for Producing Ideas, and the Brain Pickings blog. So much of past innovation has relied on the combinatorial process, and I feel that not enough people venture outside of their immediate interests to find new and exciting material that will lead to further insight into coming up with solutions for their current creative problems.

    Michael Weber is such a huge inspiration in this regard, as well — reading about how he developed one of his memory routines from The Design of Everyday Things, as well as how so much of his presentations are inspired from natural, relatable, real-world occurrences as opposed to contrived, unrealistic premises really gives one food for thought, and makes one want to be as well-versed in terms of insight and attention to the world around us as he is.

    If that’s even possible.


Leave a comment

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *